Chat with us, powered by LiveChat Conduct a literature review using the GCU Library. Evaluate qualitative or quantitative articles and | Economics Write
+1(978)310-4246 credencewriters@gmail.com
  

Conduct a literature review using the GCU Library. Evaluate qualitative or quantitative articles and find six to eight peer-reviewed primary research articles that provide critical support for the specific health care administration problem or barrier you want to address in your Business Research Paper.Use the “Literature Review: Table of Evidence” template to document your detailed assessment of each primary study. This document helps break down the components of each article to ensure the article meets the requirements for a professional health care paper. Ensure that each of your articles provides information that meets each criterion listed. Provide a detailed and clear explanation when describing how each article supports your business research topic (between three and five sentences).This assignment uses a “Literature Review: Table of Evidence Grading Form” that corresponds to the “Literature Review: Table of Evidence” template. Instructors will be using the grading form to assess the assignment and provide useful feedback; therefore, students should review the grading form prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
Conduct a literature review using the GCU Library. Evaluate qualitative or quantitative articles and find six to eight peer-reviewed primary research articles that provide critical support for the spe
Literature Review: Table of Evidence Grading Form Instructors will use this form to review each category for accuracy and appropriateness of articles, article interpretation (making sure articles meet assignment criteria), and to assess the degree to which the articles support the approved Business Research Paper topic. Each category will be scored based upon how the student’s work correlates with the criteria provided. Feedback will be provided on each category to clarify the strengths and weakness of the material. Use this feedback to complete your Business Research Paper. Student Name: Category % Value Less Than Satisfactory Satisfactory Excellent Instructor Comments Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and Permalink or Working Link to Access Article 15 0 – 9 Points Six or more research articles do not meet the criteria for being peer reviewed or from relevant journals. A number of relevant research articles are insufficient for this project. Less than eight articles are submitted overall. Web links are missing or are insufficient to accurately validate content. Major changes are needed. 10 – 13 Points Six or more research articles meet the majority of the requirements for the assignment. Web links are present, but not all are sufficient to validate content. Moderate changes are needed. 14 – 15 Points Six or more research articles are clearly identified and meet the assignment criteria. Web links are present and sufficient for content validation. No changes or minor changes are needed. Points______________ Article Title and Year Published 10 0 – 6 Points Six or more research articles do not have accurate titles. Most publications are more than 5 years old (minus seminal research). 7 – 8 Points Six or more research articles meet the majority of the requirements for the assignment. More recent publications are needed on only some articles or topics. Moderate changes are needed. 9 – 10 Points Six or more research articles are clearly identified and meet all assignment criteria. No changes or minor changes are needed. Points________________ Article Interpretation Quality Less Than Satisfactory Satisfactory Excellent Instructor Comments Research Questions (Qualitative)/ Hypothesis (Quantitative), and Purposes/Aim of Study 1 – 3 Points Research questions/ hypothesis are/is not clearly or accurately identified. Key information is missing in each category. Student does not identify purpose of study in any of the articles. Major changes are needed. 4 Points Most research questions/ hypothesis are/is identified. Key information is presented in all articles, but with discrepancies. Student identifies purpose only in some studies, or misidentifies purpose in some studies. Moderate changes are needed. 5 Points Key information is accurately presented for this category. No changes or minor changes are needed. Points________________ Design (Quantitative, Qualitative, or Other) 1 – 3 Points Design identification (quantitative/qualitative) is missing in all or many of the articles. The majority of the articles have been incorrectly identified. Major changes needed. 4 Points Design is identified for all articles, but with consistent misidentification of design type, or with major discrepancies. Moderate changes are needed. 5 Points Design is accurately identified correctly for all articles. No changes or minor changes are needed. Points______________ Setting/Sample 1 – 3 Points Key information is missing or misidentified in each category. Major changes are needed. 4 Points Key information is presented, but with discrepancies. Moderate changes are needed. 5 Points All key information is accurately presented for each category. No changes or minor changes are needed. Points______________ Methods: Intervention/ Instruments 1 – 3 Points Method information is missing for all or some articles. Major changes are needed. 4 Points Method information is presented in all articles, but with inaccuracies. Moderate changes are needed. 5 Points Methods are accurately presented for each category. No changes or minor changes are needed. Points______________ Analysis 1 – 3 Points Analysis is missing for all or some articles. Major changes are needed. 4 Points Analysis is presented for all articles, but with discrepancies. Moderate changes are needed. 5 Points Analysis is accurately presented for each article. No changes or minor changes are needed. Points______________ Key Findings 1 – 3 Points Key information on findings is missing in all or some articles. Major changes are needed. 4 Points Key findings are presented in all articles, but with missing information or discrepancies. Moderate changes are needed. 5 Points Key findings are accurately presented for this category. No changes or minor changes are needed. Points______________ Recommendations 1 – 3 Points Recommendations are missing on some or all articles. Recommendations for all or many articles lack rationale, clarity, or accuracy. Major changes are needed. 4 Points Recommendations are presented in all articles, but some are lacking in rationale, clarity, or accuracy. Moderate changes are needed. 5 Points Recommendations are accurately presented for each category. No changes or minor changes are needed. Points______________ Supporting Rationale Less Than Satisfactory Satisfactory Excellent Instructor Comments Explanation of How the Article Supports Your Identified Barrier or Issue in Health Care 40 0 – 27 Points Explanations are missing for all or some of the articles. Explanations generally lack adequate support and rationale for the specific health care administration problem or barrier Major changes are needed. 28 – 36 Points Explanations are provided for all articles, but explanations are superficial. Explanations offer minimal support and rationale to support the specific health care administration problem or barrier Moderate changes are needed. 37 – 40 Points Thorough, detailed explanation is provided for all articles. Specific article content is referenced, showing support for the specific health care administration problem or barrier No changes or minor changes are needed. Points______________ Overall Comments Total Points Awarded ______________ © 2016. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Conduct a literature review using the GCU Library. Evaluate qualitative or quantitative articles and find six to eight peer-reviewed primary research articles that provide critical support for the spe
Literature Review: Table of Evidence Student Name: Describe the barrier/health care administration issue addressed in your Business Research Paper (two or three sentences): Criteria Article 1 Article 2 Article 3 Article 4 Article 5 Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and Permalink or Working Link to Access Article Article Title and Year Published Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative), and Purposes/Aim of Study Design (Quantitative, Qualitative, or Other) Setting/Sample Methods: Intervention/Instruments Analysis Key Findings Recommendations Explanation of How the Article Supports Your Identified Barrier or Issue in Health Care Criteria Article 6 Article 7 Article 8 Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and Permalink or Working Link to Access Article Article Title and Year Published Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative), and Purposes/Aim of Study Design (Quantitative, Qualitative, or other) Setting/Sample Methods: Intervention/Instruments Analysis Key Findings Recommendations Explanation of How the Article Supports Your Identified Barrier or Issue in Health Care © 2016. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

error: Content is protected !!