Chat with us, powered by LiveChat Week 4 Project Assignment Due June 28 at 11:59 PM What is a Just State?In a 2–3-page paper, addres | Economics Write
+1(978)310-4246 credencewriters@gmail.com
  

Week 4 Project Assignment Due June 28 at 11:59 PM What is a Just State?In a 2–3-page paper, address the following: Explain intersectionality Explain at least one social philosophy from the textbook. For instance, you might discuss utilitarianism, Rawls, Marx, Nozick, Du Bois, King, or Beauvoir. If the theory has a clear correlate, please discuss it as well. Illustrate your understanding of both the intersectional and traditional social justice approaches with examples. Support your account of the theories with citations to the textbook and online lectures in correct APA format. Use this APA Citation Helper as a convenient reference for properly citing resources.
Week 4 Project Assignment Due June 28 at 11:59 PM What is a Just State?In a 2–3-page paper, address the following: Explain intersectionality Explain at least one social philosophy from the textboo
Rubric Assessment Top of Form This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Criteria No Submission 0 points 0 % Emerging (F through D range) (1–13) 13 points 13 % Satisfactory (C range) (14–15) 15 points 15 % Proficient (B range) (16–17) 17 points 17 % Exemplary (A range) (18–20) 20 points 20 % Criterion Score Explained Intersectionality and a traditional social justice philosophy. Add Feedback Student did not submit assignment Shows little or no understanding of assignment concepts Demonstrates a clear understanding of the assignment concepts with some inability to fully articulate them Demonstrates the ability to evaluate and apply most assignments concepts Demonstrates the ability to evaluate, apply and synthesize key assignment concepts / 20 / 20 * Criterion score has been overridden This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Criteria No Submission 0 points 0 % Emerging (F through D range) (1–6) 6 points 6 % Satisfactory (C range) (7) 7 points 7 % Proficient (B range) (8) 8 points 8 % Exemplary (A range) (9–10) 10 points 10 % Criterion Score Illustrated both approaches with relevant examples. Add Feedback Student did not submit assignment Work does not meet assignment expectations; no clear purpose is provided Assignment meets expectations with minimal depth and breath; the purpose provided is vague Assignment meets expectations with minimal depth and breath; the purpose provided is vague Assignment meets or exceeds expectations with all components being addressed in good depth and breath; a comprehensive purpose statement delineates all requirements of the assignment / 10 / 10 * Criterion score has been overridden Substantiated content with the course texts Add Feedback Student did not submit assignment Work is not substantiated by sources or sources supplied do not have credibility Summarizes information gleaned from the course texts to support major points, but does not synthesize; provides minimal justification to support major topics Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from the course texts to support major points presented Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from the course texts to support major points presented / 10 / 10 * Criterion score has been overridden This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Criteria No Submission 0 points 0 % Emerging (F through D range) (1–2) 2 points 2 % Satisfactory (C range) (3) 3 points 3 % Proficient (B range) (4) 4 points 4 % Exemplary (A range) (5) 5 points 5 % Criterion Score Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; and displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation Add Feedback Student did not submit assignment Errors in basic writing conventions are sufficiently numerous to prevent reader comprehension Submission contains incoherent or inconsistent presentation of ideas, which prevents understanding the majority of author’s overall intent The reader can follow the author’s overall intent as stated; there may be errors in basic writing conventions but these do not interfere with reader comprehension The writer’s overall argument and language are clear and focused, leaving the reader with no confusion about author’s intent; the text is basically error free / 5 / 5 * Criterion score has been overridden Used APA formatted citations and references, and used correct structural formatting Add Feedback Student did not submit assignment No attempt at Academic/APA formatting Academic/APA format is attempted but errors are distracting Using Academic/APA format, accurately; errors are noticeable but minor Using Academic/APA format proficiently; text is basically error free / 5 / 5 * Criterion score has been overridden Rubric Total Score Total Total Score Clear Override / 50 / 50 * Criterion score has been overridden Overall Score Overall Score No Submission0 points minimum Clear Override Emerging (F through D range)1 point minimum Clear Override Satisfactory (C range)35 points minimum Clear Override Proficient (B range)40 points minimum Clear Override Exemplary (A range)45 points minimum Clear Override Overall Feedback Close Bottom of Form

error: Content is protected !!